The information contained herein (the “Information”) may not be reproduced or disseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission from the Company. The information herein is meant only for general reading purposes and the views being expressed only constitute opinions and therefore cannot be considered as guidelines, recommendations or as a professional guide for the readers. The document has been prepared based on publicly available information, internally developed data and other sources believed to be reliable. The directors, employees, affiliates or representatives (“Entities & their affiliates”) do not assume any responsibility for, or warrant the accuracy, completeness, adequacy, reliability and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Readers are advised to rely on their own analysis, interpretations & investigations. Certain statements made in this presentation may not be based on historical information or facts and may be forward looking statements including those relating to general business plans and strategy, future financial condition and growth prospects, and future developments in industries and competitive and regulatory environments. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements are reasonable, they do involve several assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Readers are also advised to seek independent professional advice to arrive at an informed investment decision. Entities & their affiliates including persons involved in the preparation or issuance of this document shall not be liable in any way for direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages, including on account of the lost profits arising from the information contained in this material. Readers alone shall be fully responsible for any decision taken based on this document.
Copyright © 2022 Fintso

August 2026 proved to be a challenging month for India’s benchmark equity indices, with both the Nifty 50 and the BSE Sensex ending in negative territory and snapping their two-month winning streak from June and July. The Nifty 50 closed the month at 24,080.40, declining approximately 1.24% from its July-end level, while the BSE Sensex ended at 76,957.27, down around 1.46%. Although the headline indices registered losses, the broader market displayed considerably more resilience, with mid- and small-cap stocks continuing to attract investor interest. This divergence highlighted that August was less a broad-based market correction and more a period of pressure on large-cap stocks amid a challenging global macroeconomic environment.

The month began on a relatively stable note, with the benchmark indices remaining firm during the first week and even registering modest gains. However, sentiment deteriorated as the month progressed. The indices experienced a prolonged period of weakness, including a seven-session losing streak in mid-August, before staging a brief recovery. The recovery, however, proved short-lived as renewed global risk-off sentiment pushed the market lower toward the end of the month. The combination of geopolitical concerns, higher crude oil prices, uncertainty over global interest rates and currency pressures ultimately weighed on investor sentiment.

One of the most significant factors influencing Indian equities during August was the sharp rise in crude oil prices. Brent crude moved towards $93–94 per barrel by late August amid renewed tensions in the Middle East and uncertainty surrounding the Strait of Hormuz. Higher crude prices increase the country’s import bill and can widen current-account pressures, while simultaneously putting pressure on the Indian rupee. Rising oil prices can also contribute to higher domestic inflation and put pressure on corporate margins, particularly for companies and industries that are heavily dependent on energy and transportation costs. With headline CPI inflation already at 4.5% in July, the increase in crude prices added another layer of concern for investors. Consequently, oil emerged as one of the biggest factors weighing on market sentiment throughout August.

Global interest-rate expectations were another important source of volatility. Towards the latter part of August, hawkish signals from the US Federal Reserve, coupled with rising global bond yields, triggered renewed risk-off sentiment across emerging markets. Higher US yields make dollar-denominated assets relatively more attractive and can reduce the appeal of emerging-market equities such as India. A stronger dollar can also put additional pressure on emerging-market currencies, including the rupee. At the same time, higher global yields increase the discount rate applied to future corporate earnings, which can weigh particularly heavily on high-growth and interest-rate-sensitive sectors. These concerns contributed to the selling pressure on large-cap Indian equities during the latter part of the month. Foreign institutional investor flows also played a key role in market direction. At the beginning of August, foreign investors turned net buyers for several sessions, helping the domestic market remain relatively resilient despite concerns surrounding crude oil. However, as oil prices climbed and global yields increased, foreign flows became more cautious and turned negative during parts of the month. This contributed to the weakness seen towards month-end. Currency movements added to the pressure. The rupee weakened from around ₹95.17–95.20 per US dollar early in August to approximately ₹95.70 by late August, with the Reserve Bank of India intervening to contain excessive volatility around the ₹96 per dollar level. Foreign-flow uncertainty and rupee depreciation remained key concerns for investors.

Domestic inflation also remained an important consideration. July CPI inflation of 4.5% kept inflationary pressures on the radar, particularly amid rising crude oil prices. If higher oil prices persist, the potential for renewed inflation could limit the room available for further monetary easing. For equity markets, higher inflation and reduced expectations of rate cuts can act as a valuation headwind, especially for growth-oriented and rate-sensitive segments. Thus, even though domestic economic fundamentals remained relatively supportive, the market had to balance those positives against the possibility of a less accommodative monetary environment. Corporate earnings provided some support during the month. The Q1 FY27 earnings season was broadly encouraging, with several companies reporting results ahead of market expectations. This helped sustain selective buying and provided support to stocks with strong earnings visibility. Importantly, the earnings environment prevented the market correction from becoming more widespread. Instead, the market became increasingly stock-specific, with investors rewarding companies that delivered strong results while remaining cautious towards businesses exposed to macroeconomic and global risks. This also helped mid and small-cap stocks remain relatively resilient even as the major benchmark indices came under pressure. The divergence between large-cap and broader-market performance was one of the defining characteristics of August. While the Nifty 50 and Sensex declined, the Nifty Midcap 100 gained approximately 2.1%, and the Nifty Smallcap 100 rose around 3.1%. This suggests that the month was not characterised by indiscriminate selling across the equity market. Instead, investors continued to identify opportunities in mid- and small-cap companies, particularly those supported by strong earnings and domestic demand. The relative strength of these segments indicates that domestic liquidity and investor appetite for selected growth opportunities remained intact despite pressure on the headline indices. Market structure also contributed to volatility during August. India introduced the new Closing Auction Session mechanism on August 3, changing the process through which official closing prices are determined. While this structural change was not the primary reason for the monthly decline, it contributed to increased intraday volatility, particularly around the final minutes of trading, expiry sessions and index rebalancing events. The market also witnessed additional stock-specific volatility due to the MSCI index rebalancing at the end of August. Changes in index weightings resulted in significant buying and selling activity in individual stocks and amplified movements in certain large-cap names. The performance of heavyweight stocks was another factor behind the weakness in the headline indices. HDFC Bank, one of the largest constituents of both the Sensex and Nifty, came under pressure following uncertainty surrounding its future leadership after the announcement that its CEO would not seek reappointment. Given the significant weight of the bank in the benchmark indices, weakness in the stock had an outsized impact on index performance. Reliance

Industries also came under pressure following changes to its MSCI weighting, adding to the weakness in large-cap benchmarks.

Overall, August 2026 has given contrasting signals for Indian equities. The Nifty 50 declined approximately 1.2%, while the Sensex fell around 1.4–1.5%. However, the resilience of mid- and small-cap stocks, supportive corporate earnings and continued domestic liquidity demonstrated that investor confidence had not disappeared. The principal challenge came from the external environment, particularly crude oil prices, Middle East tensions, US interest-rate expectations, global bond yields and currency movements.

Indian debt markets went through a genuinely turbulent August 2026, even though the month began on a fairly stable footing. The Reserve Bank of India's Monetary Policy Committee, meeting from August 3 to 5, kept the repo rate unchanged at 5.25% for a fourth straight review, retained its "neutral" stance in a unanimous 6-0 vote, and actually raised its FY27 GDP growth forecast to 6.7% while trimming its inflation projection — a broadly reassuring start that gave short- and medium-duration bonds some initial support. But sentiment deteriorated steadily through the second half of the month, and by August 31 the market looked very different from how it had looked on August 5.

The benchmark 10-year G-Sec yield was the clearest signal of this shift. Having traded in the high-6.7%-to-6.8% range for much of August, it climbed through the final week to touch around 6.95% by month-end — a twelve-week high and one of the sharpest monthly moves of the fiscal year. Three forces combined to drive this: Brent crude pushing back up toward the low-$90s a barrel on Middle East tensions and worries about the Strait of Hormuz, which raised India's import-bill and inflation concerns; hawkish commentary from US Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh around the Jackson Hole period, which lifted US Treasury yields (the 10-year US yield hovered near 4.6–4.7%) and firmed up expectations of a September Fed move; and a domestic mood that had turned more cautious even without an actual RBI rate hike, as commentary around the August MPC minutes and remarks from senior RBI officials on food and fuel price risks were read by markets as leaving less room for further easing. It's worth being precise here: the RBI did not signal an imminent hike in its formal August decision — it held rates and kept a neutral stance — but the tone of subsequent commentary was enough to shift trader expectations toward "when," not "if," a tightening bias might eventually emerge.

The move up the curve was not uniform. Shorter-tenor instruments — treasury bills, certificates of deposit, commercial paper — stayed comparatively insulated because they track the RBI's policy rate and liquidity conditions more than long-run inflation expectations, and the repo rate itself never moved. This left a curve that flattened or bear-steepened depending on the segment: long-dated G-Secs bore the brunt of the sell-off even as very short paper held up reasonably well. Adding to the pressure at the front end, the RBI's special FCNR(B) window for dollar deposits — which had drawn a strong response — was closed early, on August 31 rather than its original September 30 deadline, removing a source of dollar inflows that had been finding its way into short-term Indian debt and tapering off one of the props that had kept front-end yields lower earlier in the year. Corporate bonds moved in step with the sovereign curve, with yields rising most at the short end, though quality made a real difference: AAA-rated paper from financial institutions, PSUs and large corporates continued to see solid demand, since the deterioration was almost entirely an interest-rate story rather than a credit story. Investors stayed selective, favoring AAA/AA names and shorter-to-intermediate maturities rather than reaching for yield further down the credit spectrum. That said, the rise in benchmark yields visibly cooled primary issuance — companies raised markedly less through private placements in August than in July, as higher borrowing costs discouraged fresh deals, and bankers were doubtful of a quick rebound in September given how sharply yields had moved.

State Development Loans tracked the same dynamic as G-Secs, since they're priced off the sovereign curve: existing holders faced mark-to-market losses, but the higher yields also meant more attractive entry points for new buyers, with SDLs still drawing interest from investors seeking spread pickup over comparable central government paper. On the flows side, debt mutual funds carried into August a pattern of weaker allocations to duration that had already been building over April–July, with short-duration, low-duration and banking & PSU funds — offering roughly 7–8% yields with high credit quality — remaining the preferred pockets, while duration-oriented funds saw reduced demand as managers like those at Bandhan AMC actively trimmed portfolio duration ahead of anticipated rate risk. Foreign investors added further pressure. With India-US 10-year spreads compressed toward multi-decade lows, and the rupee under strain from both oil and a firmer dollar, Indian bonds looked comparatively less attractive once currency and hedging costs were factored in — a dynamic reinforced by the same hawkish Fed repricing that pushed US yields higher. Taken together, August 2026 was essentially a "yields up, duration down" month: an unchanged repo rate and neutral RBI stance provided a floor, but oil-driven inflation risk, a hawkish turn in global rates, fading FCNR-related liquidity support, and heavy long-end supply pushed the 10-year G-Sec to a twelve-week high near 6.95%. Short-duration and high-quality credit held up comparatively well, leaving long-dated government and corporate bonds as the clear underperformers — though the resulting higher yields.

Precious metals delivered a strong performance in August 2026, with both gold and silver witnessing sharp rallies and reaching fresh record levels before experiencing some profit-taking towards the end of the month. Domestic 24-carat gold started August at around ₹1,43,680 per 10 grams on August 3 and gained steadily during the month, crossing ₹1,48,000–₹1,49,000 in the first week before accelerating further. By August 24, gold reached a fresh record of around ₹1,64,730 per 10 grams, gaining nearly 15% from the beginning of the month. Internationally, Comex gold also touched a new high of around US$4,737 per ounce, highlighting the strength of the global bullion rally. The sharp rise was supported by a combination of expectations for a more accommodative US monetary-policy outlook, lower US yields, dollar weakness, geopolitical uncertainty and continued institutional demand. However, the pace of appreciation left gold vulnerable to profit-booking. By August 31, domestic gold had corrected to approximately ₹1,55,430 per 10 grams, nearly 5% below its August peak, although it remained substantially higher than its level at the beginning of the month.

Silver followed a similar upward trajectory but demonstrated greater resilience during the late-month correction. Domestic silver started August at around ₹2,184 per 10 grams, equivalent to approximately ₹218 per gram, and climbed to about ₹2,479 per 10 grams by August 24. Although it eased towards month-end, silver declined only modestly to approximately ₹2,423 per 10 grams, or ₹2,42,320 per kilogram, on August 31. This still represented a monthly gain of more than 11% based on the domestic prices cited. Internationally, Comex silver traded around US$67 per ounce towards the end of August. Silver's relative outperformance during the correction reflected its additional support from industrial demand and tight physical inventories. Demand from solar photovoltaic applications, electric vehicles, electronics and data-centre infrastructure remained an important structural driver, while investment demand provided further momentum.

Several factors contributed to the broad-based rally in precious metals. First, expectations of a softer US Federal Reserve policy stance and periods of weakness in the US dollar reduced the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets such as gold and silver. Expectations of lower real interest rates, reinforced by softer US economic and employment indicators, encouraged investors to increase exposure to bullion. US Treasury yields also declined at various points during the month, providing an additional tailwind. Second, investment flows improved materially. After a period of weakness and outflows, global gold exchange-traded products witnessed renewed buying, with significant inflows during early and mid-August, signalling a recovery in institutional investor sentiment. Indian gold ETFs also continued to attract investor interest, supporting domestic investment demand.

Central-bank purchases remained another important structural pillar of the precious-metals market. Countries including China, Poland, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan continued to accumulate gold, reinforcing expectations that official-sector demand would remain strong. Such purchases provide a relatively stable source of demand and have helped strengthen the longer-term investment case for gold despite periodic corrections. Geopolitical tensions also supported safe-haven demand. Renewed concerns surrounding the Middle East, including tensions affecting regional shipping and energy supplies, encouraged investors to seek defensive assets. Rising crude-oil prices added to market uncertainty, although the impact of higher energy prices on bullion was mixed because persistent inflation could potentially delay monetary easing. Silver benefited from the monetary and safe-haven factors supporting gold while also adding momentum from its industrial fundamentals. Tight inventories, robust industrial consumption and expectations of continued demand from renewable energy, electric vehicles, electronics and technology infrastructure helped silver outperform during the rally.

Overall, August 2026 was a particularly strong month for bullion, driven by a combination of lower real yields, dollar movements, geopolitical uncertainty, central-bank accumulation and renewed investment flows. Silver additionally benefited from structural industrial demand and supply tightness, enabling it to demonstrate greater resilience during the late-month correction.

The Indian rupee had a choppy but largely range-bound trading pattern in August 2026, remaining under pressure for most of the month but ending only marginally weaker against the US dollar. USD/INR opened the month at around ₹95.40 and traded within a relatively narrow but volatile range. The rupee strengthened to approximately ₹94.84 on August 5, supported by a temporary decline in crude-oil prices following the Reserve Bank of India's policy decision, but subsequently weakened as oil prices and global risk concerns resurfaced. The currency touched around ₹96.00 on August 24 before recovering towards the end of the month. Overall, USD/INR closed August near ₹95.17–₹95.60, depending on the market reference used, implying only a marginal monthly depreciation of roughly 0.1–0.5%. Despite this limited monthly movement, the rupee remained close to historically weak levels and had depreciated significantly over the preceding year.

The principal pressure on the rupee came from fluctuations in crude-oil prices amid continuing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Brent crude remained elevated for much of August as concerns over the Strait of Hormuz and uncertainty surrounding the US-Iran situation periodically intensified. Oil prices moved towards the high-$80s and, at times, closer to $90 per barrel before easing as geopolitical concerns moderated. Given India's dependence on imported crude, higher oil prices directly increase the country's import bill and demand for US dollars, placing downward pressure on the rupee. Conversely, temporary declines in crude prices provided short-lived relief to the currency. Sustained dollar demand from importers also weighed on the rupee, as Indian companies needed foreign currency to settle import bills and meet their external obligations. Maturing positions in the offshore non-deliverable forward (NDF) market further contributed to intermittent dollar demand.

Global monetary and financial-market conditions added to the pressure. The US dollar remained relatively firm during parts of August as elevated US Treasury yields and uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve's future policy direction encouraged demand for the dollar. Higher US yields reduce the relative attractiveness of emerging-market assets and can trigger capital outflows, thereby weighing on currencies such as the rupee. Periodic risk-off sentiment in global markets, coupled with selling by foreign portfolio investors in Indian equities, also generated additional demand for dollars.

A key factor preventing a sharper depreciation was active intervention by the Reserve Bank of India. The RBI reportedly continued to manage currency volatility through spot and forward-market operations, selling dollars when pressure on the rupee intensified. This intervention helped contain moves beyond the ₹95.5–₹96 levels and reinforced the perception that the central bank was willing to prevent excessive volatility rather than target a specific exchange-rate level. Strong foreign-exchange reserves provided the RBI with sufficient capacity to smooth the market and absorb temporary demand for dollars.

Foreign-currency inflows through the RBI's special FCNR(B) deposit-related measures also provided support during the month. These inflows strengthened the country's external liquidity position and increased the RBI's ability to intervene in the foreign-exchange market. However, support from these flows began to diminish towards month-end as the special FCNR(B) window was closed earlier than originally scheduled. This reduced one of the temporary cushions supporting the rupee.

Overall, August 2026 was characterised more by managed stability than a clear directional move. Elevated crude prices, geopolitical uncertainty, firm US yields and sustained dollar demand created persistent depreciation pressure, while RBI intervention, strong foreign-exchange reserves and foreign-currency inflows helped absorb much of the pressure. As a result, the rupee remained broadly range-bound and ended the month only marginally weaker, despite trading close to its historical lows. The August experience highlighted the RBI's continued role in smoothing currency volatility and demonstrated how policy intervention and external liquidity buffers can temporarily offset challenging global and domestic fundamentals.

Crude oil prices experienced a sharp, volatile rally in August 2026, with geopolitical developments surrounding the US-Iran conflict and the Strait of Hormuz emerging as the dominant drivers. After easing from the extreme levels seen earlier in the year, oil prices regained momentum as hopes of a lasting diplomatic resolution weakened and concerns increased over the security of one of the world's most important oil-transit routes. Brent crude opened August in the mid-$80s per barrel and moved steadily higher through the month, reaching the low-to-mid $90s by the final weeks. WTI crude followed a similar trajectory, rising from the low-$80s to the mid-to-high $80s. Overall, Brent posted a notable gain for the month, though prices stayed highly reactive to shifting geopolitical developments and news around shipping in the Persian Gulf. The Strait of Hormuz remained the major factor behind the rally. A significant share of global oil shipments normally passes through the narrow waterway, making any disruption potentially consequential for global supply. During the month, tanker traffic remained affected by the ongoing confrontation between the US and Iran, while uncertainty over the security and accessibility of the strait encouraged traders to price a substantial geopolitical risk premium into crude. Concerns intensified following reports of attacks and military actions involving shipping and energy infrastructure in the region. The possibility of a prolonged disruption to oil exports raised fears that available supplies could tighten rapidly, particularly because alternative routes cannot fully replace the volumes normally transported through Hormuz. A second major influence was the repeated breakdown of diplomatic efforts. Oil prices displayed a clear pattern of reacting to every shift in US-Iran negotiations. Whenever markets perceived that an agreement could restore normal tanker traffic, crude prices temporarily declined. Conversely, stalled negotiations, tougher rhetoric and renewed military threats triggered fresh buying in oil futures. This led to considerable price swings within the month, with Brent repeatedly oscillating between the high-$80s and low-$90s before settling into a firmer upward trend in the latter half of August. Ongoing uncertainty kept traders from fully discounting the supply risk, even as physical demand expectations stayed relatively muted.

Supply concerns were compounded by low global inventories and disruptions to refining output. Reduced flows linked to the Hormuz situation tightened physical markets further, while refinery outages elsewhere added strain to refined-product supplies. Diesel and other middle-distillate markets stayed particularly tight, partly due to disruptions in Russian refining capacity and logistical bottlenecks in the Middle East. Healthy refining margins pushed refiners to compete harder for available crude, lending further support to benchmark prices. The demand outlook, however, remained a moderating factor. Concerns about global economic growth and a relatively weak recovery in China led some agencies and market participants to revise oil-demand expectations lower. This prevented prices from rising even more sharply and created periodic corrections during the month. Nevertheless, the market's focus remained firmly on potential supply disruptions rather than demand weakness. In other words, August's rally was driven primarily by geopolitical risk and supply uncertainty rather than a sudden improvement in underlying global oil consumption.

Overall, August 2026 was characterised by a geopolitics-led oil rally. Brent moved from the mid-$80s towards the low-to-mid $90s, while WTI also recorded a substantial gain. The combination of heightened US-Iran tensions, uncertainty around the Strait of Hormuz, disrupted tanker traffic, tighter inventories and refined-product markets pushed prices higher. Although softer global demand and occasional diplomatic optimism triggered temporary pullbacks, the persistent risk of supply disruption kept crude firmly supported. The rise in oil prices also had important implications for oil-importing economies such as India, contributing to pressure on the rupee, inflation expectations and domestic financial markets during the month.

August 2026 marked a significant period of regulatory tightening and structural reform for India’s insurance sector, with the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) taking a more stringent approach to cost discipline, intermediary governance, capital adequacy and customer protection. A key development was IRDAI’s decision to bar Edelweiss Life Insurance, Pramerica Life Insurance, Niva Bupa Health Insurance and ACKO General Insurance from opening new places of business for six months for breaching prescribed Expense of Management (EoM) limits in FY25. The action was notable because it moved beyond conventional monetary penalties and introduced direct restrictions on business expansion, signalling stronger regulatory enforcement. Alongside this, the new Insurance Intermediaries Amendment Regulations, 2026 brought major changes to the distribution framework, including perpetual registration for intermediaries subject to continuing compliance, mandatory tagging of every policy to the salesperson responsible for its sale, tighter governance and disclosure requirements, and a more structured penalty mechanism. These measures are expected to improve accountability, strengthen oversight and reduce mis-selling. IRDAI also streamlined regulations covering insurer registration, capital structures, share transfers and amalgamations, aligning the framework with the 100% foreign direct investment regime and making capital raising, ownership changes and M&A transactions easier. The increased flexibility is expected to encourage greater foreign participation and capital movement across the sector. Meanwhile, a Parliamentary Committee urged IRDAI to accelerate the proposed Risk-Based Capital (RBC) framework and called for board-approved solvency restoration plans for financially weaker public-sector general insurers, with government capital support to be considered only after internal corrective measures. In health insurance, an IRDAI advisory committee proposed customer-focused reforms aimed at simplifying policy language, strengthening point-of-sale underwriting, reducing claim disputes and enabling faster settlements through standardised treatment pricing and digital platforms such as NHCX. IRDAI also enhanced sector-level data reporting by requiring insurers to submit monthly information on premiums, claims and investment income for inclusion in the government's Index of Service Production, improving the timeliness and quality of insurance-sector statistics. At the same time, the implementation of 100% FDI through the automatic route continued to support foreign investment, strategic partnerships, acquisitions and ownership restructuring. Preparations for the launch of Bima Sugam, the proposed digital insurance marketplace, also progressed, with motor, health and term insurance products expected to be among the initial offerings. Overall, August reflected a clear shift towards stricter supervision combined with structural modernisation. The regulatory focus was increasingly centred on cost efficiency, risk-sensitive capital, transparent distribution and customer protection, while the liberalised capital regime created greater scope for foreign investment and consolidation. These developments are likely to accelerate competition, digitalisation and capital reallocation across India's life, health and general insurance segments while raising compliance expectations for insurers and intermediaries.

The information contained herein (the “Information”) may not be reproduced or disseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission from the Company. The information herein is meant only for general reading purposes and the views being expressed only constitute opinions and therefore cannot be considered as guidelines, recommendations or as a professional guide for the readers. The document has been prepared based on publicly available information, internally developed data and other sources believed to be reliable. The directors, employees, affiliates or representatives (“Entities & their affiliates”) do not assume any responsibility for, or warrant the accuracy, completeness, adequacy, reliability and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Readers are advised to rely on their own analysis, interpretations & investigations. Certain statements made in this presentation may not be based on historical information or facts and may be forward looking statements including those relating to general business plans and strategy, future financial condition and growth prospects, and future developments in industries and competitive and regulatory environments. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements are reasonable, they do involve several assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Readers are also advised to seek independent professional advice to arrive at an informed investment decision. Entities & their affiliates including persons involved in the preparation or issuance of this document shall not be liable in any way for direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages, including on account of the lost profits arising from the information contained in this material. Readers alone shall be fully responsible for any decision taken based on this document.
Copyright © 2021 Fintso