Topic 3: BULLION: COSTLY PANDEMONIUM

February 2026 was one of the most turbulent months for Indian bullion in recent memory, with the Union Budget 2026 acting as the immediate catalyst for extreme price swings. The volatility was most visible on Budget Day, when both gold and silver futures on MCX crashed sharply in intraday trade before staging partial recoveries. While the broader global backdrop contributed to the turbulence, the Budget’s tax changes — particularly around Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs) — triggered aggressive liquidation in leveraged and “paper gold” positions, setting off a chain reaction across bullion markets.

The key Budget announcement that unsettled the bullion trade was the removal of capital gains tax exemption at maturity for secondary-market buyers of Sovereign Gold Bonds. Going forward, tax-free status would apply only to original subscribers holding bonds until redemption. This reduced the relative attractiveness of SGBs as a tax-efficient alternative to physical gold and gold ETFs. The move sparked profit booking in gold-linked financial products and amplified selling pressure in futures, where leveraged positions unwound rapidly.

On 1 February, MCX gold futures crashed over ₹10,000 per 10 grams and silver even more sharply amid record pre-Budget highs, as policy surprises triggered a technical selloff. Hopes for import duty reductions were dashed, keeping gold and silver taxes unchanged, which further hurt sentiment. However, this panic was brief. As the month progressed, safe-haven demand and steadier global markets supported a sharp recovery. By February’s end, gold staged a V-shaped rebound, closing near ₹1,61,720 per 10 grams, with Delhi 24K gold up 0.6% for the month, demonstrating buyers’ willingness to accumulate on dips.

Silver, however, told a far more dramatic story. Spot prices in India swung wildly, beginning near ₹3,50,000 per kg on 1 February, collapsing to around ₹2,55,000 by 18 February, and then rebounding toward ₹2,85,000–3,00,000 per kg before consolidating into month-end. The boom-bust-rebound pattern reflected silver’s inherently higher beta nature. In corrections, silver typically moves two to three times as much as gold, and February followed that script precisely.

Silver’s sharper decline compared to gold in February 2026 was driven by several factors. Silver had seen an outsized rally, with prices multiplying over the past two years, resulting in stretched technicals and heavy speculative positions fuelled by AI-related industrial demand, supply concerns in China, and robust ETF inflows. When global precious metals corrected amid a stronger US dollar and expectations of prolonged high interest rates, silver led the sell-off. The SGB tax change impacted both gold and silver, but thinner liquidity and high futures open interest in silver accelerated margin calls and forced selling, amplifying volatility. Gold, meanwhile, held up better due to consistent safe-haven demand as geopolitical tensions and equity volatility increased. By late February, both metals stabilised. Gold entered mild profit-taking near monthly highs, while silver consolidated around ₹2,80,000–2,85,000 per kg, with uniform pricing across cities reflecting reduced panic and cleaner positioning.

In summary, February 2026 was defined by a Budget-triggered shock that exposed overstretched positioning in bullion, particularly silver. Gold endured a sharp early fall but recovered to post a small net monthly gain, reinforcing its role as a resilient hedge. Silver, by contrast, experienced a violent boom-bust-rebound cycle, reflecting its higher beta and speculative character. Together, the two metals illustrated how policy surprises, technical positioning, and global macro forces can converge to produce extreme but ultimately self-correcting volatility in commodity markets.



The information contained herein (the “Information”) may not be reproduced or disseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission from the Company. The information herein is meant only for general reading purposes and the views being expressed only constitute opinions and therefore cannot be considered as guidelines, recommendations or as a professional guide for the readers. The document has been prepared based on publicly available information, internally developed data and other sources believed to be reliable. The directors, employees, affiliates or representatives (“Entities & their affiliates”) do not assume any responsibility for, or warrant the accuracy, completeness, adequacy, reliability and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Readers are advised to rely on their own analysis, interpretations & investigations. Certain statements made in this presentation may not be based on historical information or facts and may be forward looking statements including those relating to general business plans and strategy, future financial condition and growth prospects, and future developments in industries and competitive and regulatory environments. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements are reasonable, they do involve several assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Readers are also advised to seek independent professional advice to arrive at an informed investment decision. Entities & their affiliates including persons involved in the preparation or issuance of this document shall not be liable in any way for direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages, including on account of the lost profits arising from the information contained in this material. Readers alone shall be fully responsible for any decision taken based on this document.
Copyright © 2022 Fintso